Free Iraq

The US's occupation of Iraq will see to it that the Lion of Babylon rises again .. سنـُبعـَث ُ من جَديد ، وإلى ضَـيـرِِهِـم
Iraq'scover72dpi

Iraq's Nuclear Mirage ... سَراب السلاح النووي العراقي

CoverFront

Some of my interviews - video and audio clips Nov 15, 2005

My position on "The Iraqi people, the Resistance and Oil versus American bases" Feb 8, 2005

Iraqi Resistance Television (videos, many in Arabic) تلفزيون المقاومة العراقية

Monday, May 16, 2005

"Combat terrorism" by causing it


“A few days ago, an American manned check point confiscated the driver license of a driver and told him to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for interrogation and in order to retrieve his license. The next day, the driver did visit the camp and he was allowed in the camp with his car. He was admitted to a room for an interrogation that lasted half an hour. At the end of the session, the American interrogator told him: ‘OK, there is nothing against you, but you do know that Iraq is now sovereign and is in charge of its own affairs. Hence, we have forwarded your papers and license to al-Kadhimia police station for processing. Therefore, go there with this clearance to reclaim your license. At the police station, ask for Lt. Hussain Mohammed who is waiting for you now. Go there now quickly, before he leaves his shift work”.

The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors.

The only feasible explanation for this incidence is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad. The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the anticipated “hideous attack by foreign elements”.

The same scenario was repeated in Mosul, in the north of Iraq. A car was confiscated along with the driver’s license. He did follow up on the matter and finally reclaimed his car but was told to go to a police station to reclaim his license. Fortunately for him, the car broke down on the way to the police station. The inspecting car mechanic discovered that the spare tire was fully laden with explosives."
A warning to car drivers (in Arabic) May 11, 2005
And a Resistance warning to this effect May 14, 2005

A perhaps unrelated incident, but the circumstances are strangely similar.

"A Canadian man who was killed in Iraq last week – possibly by U.S. troops – lived near Toronto for years and also held Iraqi citizenship, the CBC has learned.
Some media cited unidentified sources who said he may have died after U.S. forces "tracked" a target, using a helicopter gunship, but Foreign Affairs said it's still investigating conflicting reports of the death.
U.S. officials have denied any involvement.
Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs will only say assigning blame is premature. It's still trying to get a complete picture of what happened from authorities in Baghdad."
Canadian killed in Iraq was Toronto-area trucker April 28, 2005

They are still trying to 'get the complete picture', remotely, sitting in Amman, Jordan. May I humbly suggest they go check his car? (Kindly see PS below)

“… According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld by his Defense Science Board, the new organization--the "Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG)"--would actually carry out secret missions designed to provoke terrorist groups into committing violent acts. The P2OG, a 100-member, so-called "counter-terrorist" organization with a $100-million-a-year budget, would ostensibly target "terrorist leaders," but according to P2OG documents procured by Arkin, would in fact carry out missions designed to "stimulate reactions" among "terrorist groups"--which, according to the Defense Secretary's logic, would subsequently expose them to "counter-attack" by the good guys. In other words, the plan is to execute secret military operations (assassinations, sabotage, "deception") which would intentionally result in terrorist attacks on innocent people, including Americans--essentially, to "combat terrorism" by causing it!
This notion is currently being applied to the problem of the Iraqi "insurgency," it seems. According to a May 1, 2005 report by Peter Maass in the New York Times Magazine, two of the top US advisers to Iraqi paramilitary commandos fighting the insurgents are veterans of US counterinsurgency operations in Latin America. Loaning credence to recent media speculation about the "Salvadorization" of Iraq, the report notes that one adviser currently in Iraq is James Steele (mentioned previously on this site), who led a team of 55 US Army Special Forces advisers in El Salvador in the 1980s. Maass writes that these advisors "trained front-line battalions that were accused of significant human rights abuses."
The Provocateur State - Is the CIA Behind the Iraqi "Insurgents"--and Global Terrorism? May 10, 2005

Sweet Condi donned a bullet proof vest and a combat helmet to visit Liberated Iraq
Sweet Condi Condi

PS
While on the subject of American helicopters:

"In a new American attack on the Iraqi civilian population, a US helicopter gunship opened fire on two civilian cars, each carrying a family, in the Dumiz neighborhood of Mosul.
A statement issued by the Information Bureau of the Board of Muslim ‘Ulama’ [Scholars], the highest Sunni religious authority in occupied Iraq, a copy of which was obtained by Mafkarat al-Islam, said that the American attack killed the driver of one of the two cars along with all the members of his family except his aged mother who survived with burns.
In the other car, all the members of that family were also killed except for a little five-year-old girl.
The little girl survived the initial attack and tried to crawl out the back of the car. Some earnest people who happened to be on the scene rushed to try to rescue the girl but American troops who witnessed the crime committed by their helicopter thought only to outdo the fliers and opened fire on the rescuers and the little girl, killing all of them.
The US invader troops were thus able to relish the scene of the terrified little girl engulfed in flames before her death and afterwards they had the opportunity to survey the scene of their bloody “combined forces” massacre that left body parts of innocent people scattered everywhere."
Mosul May 15, 2005

"She stood in the crowded room as her drove of minions stood around her...…A huddling mass trying to draw closer to her aura of evil. The lights flashed against her fangs as her cruel lips curled into a grimace. It was meant to be a smile but it wouldn't reach her cold, lifeless eyes… It was a leer- the leer of the undead before a feeding...
The above was not a scene from Buffy the Vampire Slayer- it was just Condi Rice in Iraq a day ago. At home, we fondly refer to her as The Vampire. She's such a contrast to Bush- he simply looks stupid. She, on the other hand, looks utterly evil."
The Dead and the Undead... May 18, 2005

Comments:
Kindly note that only discussible comments are welcome for posting on this Blog. Irrelevant/impolite comments will be deleted.
Who is this site for?

 
Dr. Khadduri
Your postings do a fine job in showing the grim reality of damage and death to American military forces in Iraq like your abolkhaseb.net links showing destroyed American vehicles. Clearly mainstream media do not (or cannot) show all these footage or describe the real events and toll of significant damage suffered by the Americans. Of course this shouldn't be a surprise to most of us.
Their government administration under Bush/Cheney and co. never dares to tell the truth about anything even to their own people. Even the photo taking of coffins of American servicemen/women returning to US shores is banned.
Journalists who ask tough/critical questions about Bush's policies in the White House or anywhere in America are ignored or branded as
unpatriotic whilst during the build-up to the Iraqi invasion, mainstream media often acted as Bush's strongest cheerleaders without much critical review of the false reasons for invading.

However besides trying to portray an optimistic and patriotic image of impending victory by American forces over the "terrorists/insurgents", I believe this cover-up by American mainstream media also has a subtle,sinister aim as well.

That is,when the media hardly shows/states the real damage suffered by American military forces but instead focuses on the car-bombings,kidnappings, beheadings and town explosions and also deaths of civilians and government officials, the genral public gets the impression that the Iraqi resistance is an evil, sadistic,cowardly, barbaric force that must be wiped out at all cost. Also many of those people who harbored sympathies or supported the Iraqi resistance change their feelings when viewing all the media reports.

By not showing the real destruction sown to American military forces by resistance forces, many in the public assume the Iraqi resistance to not be a true resistance force battling the American occupiers but as cowardly, criminal, terrorists (which obviously the majority are not) and so public opinion is galvanised even further against the Iraqi resistance.

These opinions I mention are felt by many obviously in the US but even in Canada, among some people.
 
I apologise if this is too long…..

I don't trust the Americans but we shouldn't blame everything bad on them without evidences....If the Americans are doing these bombs in the Shia areas in Iraq to GALVANISE (as CP said)the public opinion against the "resistance", then please explain to me who's doing the same bombs in Pakistan's shia mosques? (Noting that the history of bombs in there is not a new thing).

To the Westerners who are confused on why the "resistance" in Iraq are killing civilians (usually Shia), please read about the salafi (wahabi) ideology, they are allowed (and encouraged) to kill al-rafitha (shia) who are (according to them) worse (on Islam) than the infidels, Jews and Christians.....I humbly think that they don't understand how much hatred is there against the Shia and now it's been amplified because things now are going in Shia's favor (unlike the last 1300 years).

One more thing, the link Dr Khaduri put (resistance warning to this effect, in Arabic) has a hint on how much hatred they (the “resistance”) have against the shia. It stated that they are against the SAFAWI government regardless of their co-operation with the invaders (against them come what may!!). Can you tell what they mean by SAFAWI state, if not the Shia??? p.s. the ruling of the Safawi family (Iran) came in about 1500 AD and they are considered as a shia government, however there are no REAL links between them and the current Iraqi government. I want to put a link in this regard but I don’t know whether you allow links or not (not offensive).
 
British defence chiefs warn: Trigger-happy US troops 'will keep us in Iraq for years'

A British officer said, "US troops have the attitude of shoot first and ask questions later."

"I explained that their tactics were alienating the civil population and could lengthen the insurgency by a decade. Unfortunately, when we explained our rules of engagement which are based around the principle of minimum force, the US troops just laughed."
 
Rice: U.S. will stay in Iraq
 
The American occupation forces resorted to the arrest of Iraqi women to force their husbands and brothers to surrender to the occupation, which is a weapon that no one could imagine that the American occupation forces, with all it possesses of huge military abilities, would resort to. But it actually did resort to it after the war machine failed in confronting the resistance
 

Le nationalisme pétrolier

 
Wisam
Where is Safawi mentioned? Are you on the right site?

 
Dear Evelyn:

it is very hard to understand your thinking. you dont want to answer questions posed to you.

even if i disagree with imad, he has the guts to say that he supports the resistance. i know what he stands for (but I disagree with it)..

i really dont know what you stand for. you have made it apparent that you hate bush and the neocons, and that is about it. this isnt the most pressing issue of the day in iraq. when i call my relatives in baghdad, they say that they are scared to death to go to shopping in a market because they might get killed. even your hero riverbend is complaining about all the bombs...

dont tell me that "i hate all the suffering that has come about from this war."..bla bla bla...is it logical for the resistance to blow up street markets because america invaded iraq? what is the link with bush?

dont be blinded by your hatred..fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, and hate leads to suffering....the iraqi people are suffering now because people dont want them to live in peace..they dont want them to have electricity and drinking water, they dont want them to be able to walk the streets in safety....do you call on the insurgents to stop such tactics?
 
IMAD
The CIA was behind this stuff is what I've been saying for quite awhile now.
These people are not worth a minute of our trust.
They will do ANYTHING, ANYTHING AT ALL to hold the power, even to setting up incidents like mentioned here -- completely USING innocents to further their evil schemes.
Bush called others evil.
He'd better look in the mirror.
 
Nour -
How long have you been following this blog? Through unfolding events, my position (as follows) from some weeks back remains unchanged.

I stand WITH the people of the world currently terrorized by foreign invaders.
I stand WITH those who want to see the murdering blood-thirsty thugs Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and Blair tried for crimes against humanity.
I stand WITH those calling for the occupation of Iraq to cease - forthwith.
I stand WITH those who believe the invaders should pay war reparations.
I stand WITH those who love peace and believe the bounties of this earth are for all its inhabitants.
I stand WITH those who believe war has been tried (over and over and over again) and has been found sorely wanting.
I stand WITH humanity, not with the barbarians.
I stand WITH those who love the truth.
I stand WITH those praying each day that, once again, the sun will shine for Iraq and all its peoples.
 
Dr Imad,

I don’t know what happened here but I’m almost sure I didn’t see the 2nd link that’s on the blog now (please correct me if I was wrong): (http://siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=publications45605&Category=publications&Subcategory=0), I’m sorry if I’m wrong but instead I read this (in Arabic): (http://www.albasrah.net/maqalat_mukhtara/arabic/0505/maysara_140505.htm) and it’s the “official” al-Qaeda statement regarding the car bombs. The paragraph before last stated what I translated earlier.

For Evelyn and anyone who stands with the so-called “resistance”: It’s wrong to fight evil with evil, if you have faith. And please Evelyn, no need for such statements for they won’t revive people killed by those you support and those you oppose!!!

I ask one “hypothetical” question: what will the resistance do if the US pull out tomorrow?? Who will they support to rule Iraq? The al-Qaeda wants Taliban-like regime, what does other “resistance” fractions plan to do? Think of the answer and you’ll know why they are fighting now…..

Peace….
 
It's good to see there's been so much discussion and debate over this particular post.
Just to make my statements clearer.

While I think, along with most of you, that killing and wounding innocent civilians is damn wrong and evil (and certainly those resistance forces who deliberately target civilians by exploding bombs in marketplaces etc. are behaving as monsters), the truth is that American forces have probably killed and wounded just as many (if not more) civilians than the "insurgents". And relating to my first comment in this post that mainstream American media is undoubtedly extremely influenced/biased(and coerced) to be pro-America in their war coverage, so it is that we only get stories of "insurgent" attacks killing Iraqi civilians but hardly any of American forces killing civilians which the American leadership passes off as "collateral damage".

Also given the America's history of covert-ops and support for espionage and insurgency (or anti-insurgency whichever suits their purpose) operations, it cannot be assumed that what we get in the media is what really goes on.
Consider the American support for anti-Marxist regimes and rebels in Central America during the 1980s, the support for the Afghan mujahedeen during the Soviet occupation and subsequent abandonment after the Soviet pullout which led to the lawlessness and ripe conditions for the fundamentalist Taleban to form and gain power, the secretly American-directed failed coup in Venezuela a few years ago and it isn't hard to believe that behind all (most of) these bombings of civilians lie American trickery and manipulations.

And being a constant visitor to this blog, and knowing the author, I do support his opinions and views, and so I believe his links and writings are mostly, genuine. Read the posting that these comments are under, about the Iraqis whose cars are seized and then told to go into the cities, and if that is true which I believe so, then it should be obvious that American duplicity is behind many of the "insurgent" bombing attacks on civilians.

Regardless of anything though, the killing of civilians is terrible, whether by American forces or by resistance forces. However my point is that we can never be certain of the mainstream media coverage we get from Iraq, and consequently we cannot blindly assume that the Iraqi resistance is killing its own people whether Sunni, Shiite, Kurds and other.
 
CP,
I don’t think there’s a sane person who thinks that the US (or western) media is unbiased and we all know how the US people and many westerners are misguided by their news. Saying that doesn’t mean that you shift to the other extreme to find “honest” news or the truth. Sites like albasrah.net are really low; they cherish Saddam as if he’s an angel! That alone should be enough to discredit the site. Also, that story about the driving licence is really lame; I can’t see how one can believe it. If you believe it, how do you explain the walking-suicides (which are on the rise now)? Were they also packed and asked to walk into the crowds without noticing!!! If it’s for the pure sake of arguing then you’ll come up with something. Did you hear about the young Jordanian who exploded into people in Hilla (killing at least 120)??? His father PUBLICALLY celebrated his act and received complements from the Jordanians. For me, this is the Arab mentality: anti-US (although they queue on US embassies for green cards), anti-Israeli (although they have embassies protected by their armies) and anti-shia come what may.

I hear a lot of news from family and friends in Iraq who are living the hell daily and in many occasions it’s different from what we read/see. I don’t claim to know the ultimate truth but saying the US troops did most of the civilians killing may not be right. This doesn’t mean that I trust the US troops for they are also evil.

Saladhin,
I don’t think Dr Imad has a bad soul; he’s like people of his generation who grew up on the concept of Arab unity and the like. He supported Saddam (I think) not for Saddam’s sake but to get to his goals. While we (even you I hope) share the same goals (liberate Iraq and the occupied territories), we sadly differ in the means.
 
QUESTION:
Can The Bush People Really Be So Clueless?

"How can it be that an American administration that rants around the world about democracy, human rights, freedom of expression and opinion and the freedom to worship – could accept or allow its investigators in Guantanamo to desecrate and insult the religious beliefs of detainees to extract information from them?"

ANSWER: Accepting American superiority and prisoner abuse/torture makes it all so easy. "Bush People" think the remedy is in better PR. (No photos or leaked info, appoint Karen Hughes to some sort of liaison post, send Laura on an outreach mission to Muslim women.)
 
"The US's gift to al-Qaeda"
 
Airmailing terror suspects (how it works):
New Swedish Documents Illuminate CIA Action
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?