Free Iraq

The US's occupation of Iraq will see to it that the Lion of Babylon rises again .. سنـُبعـَث ُ من جَديد ، وإلى ضَـيـرِِهِـم
Iraq'scover72dpi Iraq'scover72dpi

Iraq's Nuclear Mirage ... سَراب السلاح النووي العراقي

Unrevealed Milestones in the Iraqi National Nuclear Program: 1981-1991

معالم وأحداث غير مكشوفة في البرنامج النووي الوطني العراقي 1981-1991

CoverFront CoverFront

Friday, June 10, 2005

"How does it feel to be a big, rich contractor now?"


See this story:

"Sixteen private American security guards are under investigation for shooting at U.S. Marines and Iraqi civilians during a three-hour spree west of Baghdad, the military said Thursday.
The Marines said the 16 Americans and three Iraqi contractors were arrested and held in a military jail for three days (my emphasis) after spraying small arms fire at Iraqi civilians and U.S. forces from their cars in Fallujah (added emphasis) late last month.
There were no casualties.
Many Iraqis resent high-profile security details who speed along highways in sports utility vehicles bristling with automatic weapons.
Senior government officials, who are prime targets of militants wreaking havoc across Iraq, use private security firms for their own protection.
No charges have been filed yet following the May 28 shootings."
Military Investigates U.S. Guards in Iraq June 9, 2005

Sounds innocuous enough, no?

Now read this: The same story, the same day, the same news source (The Guardian):

"A group of American security guards in Iraq have alleged they were beaten, stripped and threatened with a snarling dog by US marines when they were detained after an alleged shooting incident outside Falluja last month.
"I never in my career have treated anybody so inhumane," one of the contractors, Rick Blanchard, a former Florida state trooper, wrote in an email quoted in the Los Angeles Times. "They treated us like insurgents, roughed us up, took photos, hazed [bullied] us, called us names." ** (emphasis added)
This is believed to be the first time that private military contractors have been detained in Iraq by the US military, and it has reignited debate about their status and accountability.
The security guards claim the shooting incident was a case of mistaken identity. A spokeswoman for the company told the LA Times that the guards had fired warning shots into the air when an unidentified vehicle approached their vehicle as it passed through Falluja, but had not fired at any marines.
... Mark Schopper, a lawyer for two of the contractors, told the newspaper that his clients, both former marines, were subjected to "physical and psychological abuse". He said they had told him that marines had "slammed around" several con tractors, stripped them to their underwear and placed a loaded weapon near their heads.
"How does it feel to be a big, rich contractor now?" one of the marines is alleged to have shouted at the men, in an apparent reference to the large sums of money private contractors can make in Iraq. Lieutenant Colonel David Lapan, a Marine Corps spokesman, who did not respond to emails from the Guardian, said in an email to the LA Times: "The Americans were segregated from the rest of the detainee population and, like all security detainees, were treated humanely and respectfully. (emphasis added, all?? see ** above)
According to Peter Singer, a Brookings Institute scholar and author of the book Corporate Warriors, private military contractors in Iraq are operating in a black hole (emphasis added) as they do not fall within the military chain of command. "What appears to have happened here is tension between forces bubbling to the surface," he told the Guardian. (emphasis added, more of a sign of deteriorating moral, my comment)
But he said the incident also raised the question of what happens to contractors if they are caught doing something wrong, such as firing on civilians, as their legal status is not defined. "If the marines think [the contractors] did do something illegal there is no process they can go through. Who are they going to hand them over to?" Mr Singer said. "There have been more than 20,000 [contractors] on the ground in Iraq for more than two years and not one has been prosecuted for anything." (emphasis added)
Marines 'beat US workers' in Iraq June 9, 2005

An Update:

Who is Zapata Corporation? (I am not sure of why the music is there, and the other seven links in the same site are dubious and, I believe, are tainted).

"Reports about armed confrontations between active duty U.S. and coalition military forces and coalition armed private military contractors in Iraq have gone from a trickle to a steady flow. While fragging incidents between U.S. enlisted and officers were more commonplace in Vietnam than ever admitted by the Pentagon, the violence between active military and quasi-mercenaries in Iraq is a fairly new phenomenon, according to U.S. military experts. What is occurring in Iraq is not friendly fire but willful fighting between occupation forces. "
Unfriendly Fire: Hostile incidents increasinf between US military and private military contractors in Iraq June 13, 2005

Don't fret. The UN to the rescue:

"Thousands of people are detained in Iraq without due process in apparent violation of international law, the United Nations has said, adding that 6,000 of the country's 10,000 prisoners were in the hands of the US military.
In Iraq, ''one of the major human rights challenges remains the detention of thousands of persons without due process,'' Secretary-General Kofi Annan said yesterday in a report to the 15-nation UN Security Council.According to the Iraqi Justice Ministry, there were about 10,000 detainees in all of Iraq as of April (emphasis added), ''6,000 of whom were in the custody of the Multinational Force'' commanded by the United States, Annan said."
US-led forces in Iraq hold 6,000 prisoners -UN June 9, 2005

Suddenly, immediately after April 2005, the "detainee population surpassed 11,350 last week, a nearly 20 percent jump since Iraq's Jan. 30 elections." by May 9, 2005.

And to that, add by now about 1,300 civilian/suspected detainees from the 'Iraqi' Shiite and Kurdish militias' "Operation Lightning" in June, 2005.

As for the UN ..........


Comments:
Kindly note that only discussible comments are welcome for posting on this Blog. Irrelevant/impolite comments will be deleted.
Who is this site for?

 
I really can’t say that I feel and sorry for the American security guards. I know that it is wrong to treat any human wrongly. I look at this way though they are their getting rich and only thinking of themselves.
 
Pray for Peace, they must try to calculate their risks before they go to Iraq. They must realise they are not the law out there. They put their lives at risk for cash - their choice. But they must accept their fate when they do so.
 
Ten Deadly Enemies of Humanity in America:
Includes a list of names and addresses of main offices of the top ten in the order of billions of dollars that were made out of the manufacture and sales of military ammunitions and weapons of mass destruction during the year 2004.
 
"My biggest enemy was not the drug cartels but the CIA and the criminals they hired."

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/051905Castillo/051905castillo.html
 
Heidi, this one's for you!
" . . . [T]he only viable action that will shut down the military machine is if soldiers mutiny or don’t show up in the first place."

Say - Thank you for your link.
 
Realizing I'm totally off-topic, but believing Saddam Hussein should be given a fair trial & that its becoming "current events" time, I post: "Saddam lawyers 'left in the dark' ", and "Saddam About To Be Suicided?"
 
Evelyn
Regarding:
- your link "if soldiers mutiny",
- and further to my above mentioned "sign of deteriorating moral" in the posting above,

This is also relevant:

The Return of "Fragging"?

I may yet compose a posting of this issue.

 
Dr. Khadduri,
Indeed: "A nation at war with itself -- who will win that one?"
 
More: ". . .[T]he only difference between Vietnam and Iraq is that Iraq does not have a jungle and its resistance has yet to form into a unified nationalist movement. . . . It is obvious the Bushcons do not have a “plan” to withdraw troops from Iraq—and that is because they plan to keep troops there indefinitely and that is why they are building bases in the country. Most Americans are clueless about the real plan Bush and the Strausscons have in mind for the Iraqis (and the Iranians and Syrians)."
 
Exit Strategy: Civil War:
"The major Iraqi resistance groups are not in favor of targeting innocent Iraqi civilians. Many groups have political liaisons who try to tell the world's media what they are fighting for. Considering that American corporate media exclusively reproduce the Pentagon line, there's widespread suspicion - in the Middle East, Western Europe, Latin America, parts of Asia - of American media complicity in the occupation, incompetence, racism, or perhaps all of the above.

"Against all odds, a national liberation front is emerging in Iraq. Washington hawks may see it coming, but they certainly don't want it. Many groups in this front have already met in Algiers. The front is opposed to the American occupation and permanent Pentagon military bases; opposed to the privatization and corporate looting of the Iraqi economy; and opposed to the federation of Iraq, ie balkanization."
 
What to make of this? And I'd like to know: Who is choosing whom?
 
Halliburton Contractors Denied Insurance Benefits: Seemingly well paid; nonetheless, cheap cannon fodder.
 
International Institute of Strategic Studies: "The occupiers will lose in Iraq"
 
Hearts & minds:
"The U.S. Special Operations Command has hired three firms to produce newspaper stories, television broadcasts and Web sites to spread American propaganda overseas,"
to include print articles, video and audio broadcasts, Internet sites and novelty items, like T-shirts and bumper stickers.
 
One estimate of what it would take to "defeat the insurgency & establish a modicum of stability": One million U.S. soldiers & possibly 30 to 60 years.
Since we don't give a fig leaf about the stability part, the above is irrelevant.
 
Howdy, I don't feel sorry for these contractors. They get paid several thousand $ per week and they should take it on the chin. They think they are John f@@@@@g Wayne or something!
 
Evelyn! 30-60 years!? I may be 60+ years before we see any progress there!? Sad for any child growing up there now; they may never see any progress in their life either.
 
Mr Imad many still believe that fragging was in the media imagination, yet there are at least 2 cases of fragging from the recent 2003 war. That definitely was not in the imagination.....it may make sense to the troops engaged in dangerous situations to eliminate the weakest and most inept commanding officers, otherwise he risks the life of his underlings by staying alive....maybe its survival of the fittest by whatever means necessary?
 
"Animosity seems to be building between Bush's contractors and Bush's war."
- Little known about how many contractors have died.
- At least 12 Iraqi civilians killed weekly in Baghdad by "contractors".
- Hundreds of millions of dollars reconstruction & security contracts unmonitored.
 
About the contractors claiming of brutal treatment from the US soldiers including taunts like the heading of this post, I wouldn't be surprised.
I mean,those poor soldiers receive petty pay and serve for months at a time while risking their lives for something they didn't even sign up for (the Iraqi occupation)
whilst those "contractors" or glorified mercenaries earn so much more money.

Remember that scene in Fahrenheit 911 where an American soldier being interviewed says that contractors get thousands of dollars driving trucks while military personnel get basically nothing (I can't recall what amount he said the soldiers get paid but it was low)?
 
CP -
Highly, highly, highly recommended:
"Stop killing us and then waving the flag!"
 
Stunning analysis. Keep this link for when you have 70 spare minutes. Time extraordinarily well spent.
Video: Hijacking Catastrophe: Documentary featuring Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Tariq Ali, and many more experts speaking about the Neo-Con agenda and the cloud of fear which the Neo-Cons have settled over America.
 
Telawrence
You apparently did not read the first comment above, yet.

 
UNFRIENDLY FIRE: HOSTILE INCIDENTS INCREASING BETWEEN US MILITARY AND PRIVATE MILITARY CONTRACTORS IN IRAQ
"What is occurring in Iraq is not friendly fire but willful fighting between occupation forces."
 
Evelyn why give credence to uruknet? Some of it seems a bit sick and pro-Baathist to me....and to show murderer low-life Saddam on the cover page with a smug smile is not exactly appropriate. They want to keep track of progress on Saddam's trial? Why? Maybe they should set up cover page to track progress of Kurds after being bombed with mustard and nerve gas.
 
Heidi
Regarding your last comment, do take a serious look at these articles, which explain why this particular charge is not being actively sought in the trial of Saddam.

 
Mr Imad, it was predictable as clockwork that at least one person on this site would raise this issue. I was waiting. I have in fact seen most of the articles that you refer to. Especially those of Mr Wanniski who frequents al Jazeera with his opinions, which seem to me to be too defensive of Saddam at times.

If Saddam had hurt my family (as he hurt families in the middle east), I would want him to be taken out and executed now, without delay.
As it is, I have never experienced such things, and so can take the more gentle view that calls for a fair trial.

You can cast small doubt over Halabja, but when you start looking at the mass graves and torture rooms, plus comments (on record) made by his ministers/relatives about gassing, destroying and burying people, he is going to have a hard time getting out of it. He is only going to dodge the bullet so many times.
 
Heidi -
Uruknet carries some excellent articles.
As for Saddam, the Rule of Law, to have any meaning, applies equally to all of us. Lamentably, the "rule of law" as a concept now has about the same stature as "democracy" and "freedom", having been totally plundered by George and his fellow travellers.
 
Evelyn it is true that uruk carries some good articles. That does not mean that I cannot question some of its approaches. I like BBC news, but I still questions some of its approaches too.
100% blind devotion is not my style.....many Americans are 100% devoted to its country and government and look where it is today...
 
Heidi -
I thought you said "Why give credence to uruknet?" Responding that they carry "some excellent articles" seems pretty uncontroversial!
 
In this case I should have said "too much credence"......

Leaving this aside, you and Mr Imad may like to take a look at this site (if you have not already) - the initial pic showing the grim reaper is sickeningly hilarious....you need dark humour but I like darkly humorous stuff...

go look at http://saddamhussein.blogspot.com/
 
Heidi
Perhaps I should have been more specific. I was particularly referring to the second article:
A Glimpse of The Past: A War Crime or an Act of War?
Stephen C. Pelletiere - NYTimes

and perhaps hear him for yourself:
Exposing the lies: Who killed the Kurds? Israel's part in a US invasion of Iraq.

 
Hello Mr Imad, I cannot reply in detail tonight as I have a badly injured arm from smashing into tree on my bike tonight. I like like ripe melon!
I will reply tomorrow if my arm is better!....maybe the tree trunk knocked sense into me?!
Have nice evening!
 
Hello Heidi
Do take an x-ray of that arm tomorrow morning, as such swelling might indicate that necessity.
Now you were not peeking at ... ??

 
aaaaaw mr imad you are very considerate. thank you for advice; i already did this, it is not broken just battered. i have black eyes though, one worse than other.....maybe a panda will try to mate with me today.....
i type with right arm only today....later i will have time to reply about saddam
 
mr imad thank you for your email.

now i am back for a few mins; i take lots of codeine today so feel better....

anyway, the second article you refer to is very interesting.
his last point about singling out iraq on human rights issues is one that any aware person realises is naive. just look at how the african states' governments behave toward their people, and then look at countries such as belarus, uzbekistan and north korea. no-one cares about the human rights of those people being oppressed - because they do not have enough natural resources and they are not a thorn in israeli side; the united nations is as impotent

even if halabja was an act of war, and not a war crime, it still does not change the fact that the iraqi government failed its own people. they should have gone to any length to avoid dropping mustard on innocent bystanders. i saw john simpson report from there in 1988 and seeing all those dead women and babies in the street was worst thing i ever saw.....maybe they launch investigation into role of iran and usa? (wishful thinking maybe)

also, it does not change fact that saddam and certain members of his regime tortured and killed mountains of innocent people - and for that they should pay with their lives and soon, not in never never land like milosevich.

anyway now saddam is going to get what he deserves. what goes around eventually comes around, and i am sure that many people will feel it is time for revenge.
one regret i have is that the silly americans killed uday and qusay....they should have got them alive and turn them into frightened old men that the rest have become. women who were raped by uday will never get revenge or justice now..it is a shame.
 
Many charges have been dropped against Saddam merely because trying him for 500 separate events will take a lifetime. They should try him for a dozen, identify all culprits and then hang them all.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

01/12/04   01/01/05   01/02/05   01/03/05   01/04/05   01/05/05   01/06/05   01/07/05   01/08/05   01/09/05   01/10/05   01/11/05   01/12/05   01/01/06   01/02/06   01/03/06   01/04/06   01/05/06   01/06/06   01/07/06   01/08/06   01/09/06   01/10/06   01/11/06   01/12/06   01/01/07   01/02/07   01/03/07   01/04/07   01/05/07   01/06/07   01/07/07   01/08/07   01/09/07   01/10/07   01/11/07   01/12/07   01/01/08   01/02/08   01/03/08   01/04/08   01/05/08   01/06/08   01/07/08   01/08/08   01/09/08   01/10/08   01/11/08   01/12/08   01/01/09   01/02/09   01/03/09   01/04/09   01/05/09   01/06/09   01/07/09   01/08/09   01/09/09   01/10/09   01/11/09   01/12/09   01/01/10   01/02/10   01/03/10   01/04/10   01/05/10   01/06/10   01/08/10   01/09/10   01/10/10   01/11/10   01/12/10   01/01/11   01/02/11   01/03/11   01/04/11   01/05/11   01/06/11   01/07/11   01/08/11   01/09/11   01/10/11   01/11/11   01/12/11   01/01/12   01/02/12   01/03/12   01/04/12   01/05/12   01/06/12   01/07/12   01/08/12   01/09/12   01/10/12   01/11/12   01/12/12   01/01/13   01/02/13   01/03/13   01/04/13   01/05/13  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?