Free Iraq

Israeli Diplomat Carrying Large Quantity Of Explosives Arrested In Argentina: ... The Zionist representative was en route to Chile and was detained minutes before boarding a plane. ...

For years, various reporters and independent researchers have been highlighting the false nature of the "attacks" on the Israeli embassy in Argentina and on the headquarters of AMIA (Argentine Israelite Mutual Association which was "truck bombed" in July 1994 and the blame placed on Hizb'allah)

A few weeks after Israel initiated its new aggression against Palestine and Lebanon, the Delegation of Israeli Associations of Argentina (DAIA) and the Wiesenthal Center, again began to proclaim to the press that a "third attack" in Argentina was in preparation. At the same time, the White House and the Pentagon began to announce results of their supposed investigations over the "latent dangers" in the Tripe Frontier area (area where the borders of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay meet) from the presence of the sizable "Arab Islamic community" there, including the suggestion that "al-Qaeda fighters" were ensconsed there.

According to sources, a dramatic "attack" is being planned for South America, in order to neutralise the growing rejection of Zionist barbarity among South American governments. ...

In the Zionist leadership, we notice something of a tendency towards an absolute loss of control caused by the fact that reality is not conforming to its nefarious plans. In an act of rage and impotence at not having achieved its military aims in Lebanon, in the last few days of the conflict, Israeli war planes dropped tons of bombs on Lebanese houses, hospitals, schools and religious temples, reaffirming in this way the genocidal policies of the Israeli invaders.

At the same time, the Zionist leadership in Argentina shares this irrational hatred and is totally subordinate to the directives of the Israeli government. Given this situation, intelligence analysts from various countries agree that it is very difficult to predict the exact nature of the Zionist plans for Argentina and its neighbors.

We hope that the Argentine government will finally do what must be done - reveal what happened at the airport; provide the complete details of the Israeli diplomat's identity; begin the necessary judicial investigation and demand immediate explanations from the Zionist regime in Israel. The Argentine government must also understand that to continue to cover up such matters, involves clearly forseeable risks to the security of the Argentine people and their country.
 

Swedish lawyer questions US killing of al-Qaeda number two in Iraq
 

Camp Bucca: Iraq's Guantánamo Bay: One of the biggest complaints is that the vast majority of detainees have not been charged with any crime. ...

The legal basis for detentions stems from a single line of a 2004 UN Security Council resolution, which has been renewed every year since by agreement between the US and Iraqi governments. This resolution, which gives the legal justification for continued US military occupation, allows "internment where this is necessary for imperative reasons of security."

Detainees receive an initial review of their case before being sent to Cropper, but they are not allowed to attend it. The reviews are conducted by a panel of three US military officers. Detainees are allowed to attend later reviews, but at no point are they given access to a lawyer.

Detention operations have been a rocky road. Torture and abuse at Abu Ghraib in 2003 and 2004 received the most coverage, but thousands of prisoners living in leaky tents outside the prison's "hard site" complained of lack of medical care, indifferent and at times hostile treatment from guards, inedible food and extreme weather, including flooding. American troops even admitted at the time that they believed more than 80 percent of those detained were innocent of wrongdoing. Recently released Iraqis, as well as Iraqi officials, say that this statistic is probably still true.

... One woman has five sons inside; another has a brother who has been in US prisons since 2004. Another says this is her twelfth visit to Bucca. All say that the trip is a financial strain. One says that without her husband to support her, she has been reduced to begging. Others complain that their children are depressed and failing in school.

"Most of the visits we spend crying," says Shaimaa Jumaa. "It's not just that they keep them locked up and we don't know what they're charged with. It's that they are separated from their families."
 

Video (7 min): Try Bush for murder
 

Video (1 hr 32 min): THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM - THE FULL MOVIE
 

Is Israel's booming high-tech industry a branch of the Mossad?
 

Thousands March In Baghdad Against U.S. Pact: Marchers waved Iraqi flags and chanted “Yes, yes Iraq! No, no to the occupation!”
 

"The New Kleptocracy"
 

A traitor in Baghdad, a traitor in Kabul: ... A morally enlightened citizen should refrain from supporting his own country, or more correctly his government if it chooses to do wrong and adopt policies that are manifestly immoral.

Indeed, opposing such policies is the ultimate expression of true patriotism, whereas supporting one’s country -right or wrong- reflects mindless jingoism and moral bankruptcy. This factor ultimately draws the line of distinction between civility and savagery and between enlightenment and primitiveness.

However, moral depravity occurs when citizens of a given country collaborates with foreign invaders to effect goals that are decidedly criminal and evil. Such is the case of the Iraqi government.

Nuri al Maliki, the Prime Minister of Iraq, might think that he is serving the interests of his country by allowing American imperialism to gain a permanent foothold in Iraq.

He might be tempted to argue that many countries around the world are hosting American military bases without having their respective national sovereignty compromised.

He is wrong.

First of all, Iraq is not Japan or even South Korea. The American military presence in Iraq is not designed to help the Iraqis achieve true independence, stability and prosperity.

The American occupation forces are in Iraq in order to destroy Iraq, which they have done to a large extent, torment Iraqis, and transform the land of Harun al Rashid into a virtual Zionist colony serving “ global Jewish-Zionist interests.”

Moreover, the Americans seem hell-bent on arrogating Iraqi oil by turning Iraq into a banana republic, a mere cheap market for American products.

Another important reason behind the American occupation of Iraq is to forestall the potential of Iraq becoming a threat to Zionist military supremacy once again. Otherwise, why would Mossad agents scour Iraq from north to south and from east to west to assassinate top Iraqi scientists, probably in collusion with American, Kurdish and (Iraqi) intelligence services.

In short, the United States wants to destroy or neutralize Iraq on Israel’s behalf. Wasn’t that the main factor behind the American invasion, occupation and virtual destruction of the ancient land of Mesopotamia ?
 

Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien: Obama's New Advisor Stands By His War Crimes
 

Oct 24, 2007 -
Video (75 min): The Energy Non-Crisis ( Watch. Decide what this means. )