Free Iraq

The US's occupation of Iraq will see to it that the Lion of Babylon rises again .. سنـُبعـَث ُ من جَديد ، وإلى ضَـيـرِِهِـم
Iraq'scover72dpi Iraq'scover72dpi

Iraq's Nuclear Mirage ... سَراب السلاح النووي العراقي

Unrevealed Milestones in the Iraqi National Nuclear Program: 1981-1991

معالم وأحداث غير مكشوفة في البرنامج النووي الوطني العراقي 1981-1991

CoverFront CoverFront

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Is Wikileaks leaking? Thank you, Evelyn.

.
A long time friend of this Blog, Evelyn (you can trace her constant and relevant comments on practically each one of the 950 postings here since January 2005 - this Blog started in December 2004), in her Comments on the previous posting portrays in stark relief the lingering doubts on the authenticity of the intentions and the probable hidden agenda of the Wikileaks recent releases.

We have already posited a question mark in the posting of October 24, 2010: "
Indeed. Why are they not mentioned at all?"

Kindly note that the Iranian Quds Force is freely mentioned in the newly leaked cables, but there is still not a single mention of the wide spread Israeli Mossad's presence, activities and influence in northern and in other parts, to a lesser extent, of Iraq, which do give the strong impression that they have been thoroughly redacted by (?).

In any event, I reproduce here what Evelyn has posted as Comments in the case that she has built up regarding her scruples about Wikileaks:

Update:
The Folly of the Israeli AND Arab Approach to Iran. Is Wikileaks being manipulated by an intelligence service? December 1, 2010

Video (5 min): RT: WIK-I-SRAEL LEAKS

Wikileaks - The Tel Aviv Connection: What is Tel Aviv to do now that it's known Israelis and pro-Israelis 'fixed' the intelligence that induced the U.S. to war in Iraq?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Con me consistently for six decades and the relationship is over, as is Israel's credibility as a legitimate nation state.

Tel Aviv knows this. But what can the Zionist state do about it? Answer: Wikileaks.

Why now? Misdirection. Shine the spotlight on Washington to take it off Tel Aviv. That's good old-fashioned psy-ops. And challenge the credibility of the U.S. That's Wikileaks.

Any credible forensics would start by asking: to whose benefit? Then look to means, motive and opportunity plus the presence of stable nation-state intelligence inside the U.S.

Other than Israel, who else is a credible candidate? Notice how quickly Israel's role in the peace process vanished from the news. Now it's Iran, Iran and more Iran. To whose benefit?

Tel Aviv knows that the phony intelligence on Iraq leads to those skilled at waging war "by way of deception"-the motto of the Israeli Mossad. Wikileaks are noteworthy for what's missing: the absence of any material damaging to Israeli goals.

GORDON DUFF: SELLING WIKILEAKS, SELLING HATE FOR AMERICA: ... As author Jeff Gates points out, Wikileaks is simple “game theory,” an Israeli psychological operation meant to provide cover for acts of genocide they have taken part in. What will a country like Israel do when it becomes public that they are stealing organs from prisoners they arrested for throwing rocks at their tanks and bulldozers.

Funny thing, nobody has ever found the magic Wikileaks “treehouse” with the dozens of elves who sift through documents. The NSA and a dozen other agencies can pick up these keystrokes on my computer the second they hit, tap 200 million telephones, kidnap a woman off the streets of Karachi with a two minute phone request but they don’t seem to be able to find the offices or computers of Wikileaks.

Is Wikileaks a front for the CIA or the Mossad?

A comment posted by Mike Rivero at WhatReallyHappened.com:

"Last week, the Department of Homeland Security seized the domain names of roughly 70 websites for copyright infringement. There were no warrants, no court orders, and no court hearings before a judge. The DHS simply used their authority to grab websites on the basis they are perceived threats (apparently Osama Been Deadforawhile makes a good living with bootleg DVDs).

So, if WikiLeaks is really exposing dangerous classified diplomatic cables that are a threat to the United States, why didn't DHS seize the WikiLeaks domain? Assange was dropping hints of a major leak to come. If WikiLeaks was a real whistleblower, DHS could shut them down by grabbing their domain name just as easily as it shut down the copyright violators.

But they didn't.

The dog did not bark!

WikiLeaks is a fake whistleblower, an attempt to repackage old ABCNNBBCBS lies in a new form that the public will swallow.

There is no other possible explanation for DHS not to seize the domain as a real threat, especially since Assange was not shy about dropping hints as to what was to come!

WikiLeaks is a propaganda front."

Is Assange a Soros and CIA asset?

"Don't hunt down my son," says mother of WikiLeaks founder: Christine Assange, who runs a puppet theater . . .

WIKILEAKS IS ZIONIST POISON: Where are the leaks on the 55 Zionist companies profiting from Iraqi blood being spilled (23)? Where are the leaks on Iraq’s artifacts being stolen by Zionist agents (24)? Where are the leaks on hundreds of Mossad agents operating in Mosul (25)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad bomb-making facility in Kirkuk (26)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad murderers stationed in several villages around the devastated area of Fallujah (27)? Where are the leaks on the depleted-uranium-tipped IEDs of Zionist-owned Zapata Engineering that have massacred thousands in Najaf, Karbala and Tal Afar, just to name a few (28)? Where are the leaks on the Israeli arms dealers supplying weapons to CIA-trained death squads (29)? Where are the leaks on Zionist war criminal Paul Wolfowitz importing Shin Bet torture experts to train the US military (30)? Where are the leaks on Mossad conducting interrogations and torture in Iraq jails, including Abu Ghraib (31)? Where are the leaks that will actually tie the illegal war, which was exclusively designed by Zionists, to Israel? They don’t exist because Wikileaks isn’t concerned with uncovering the truth regarding the real criminals; they’re concerned with leading the public away from the truth to keep them under control. It’s COINTELPRO all over again.

GORDON DUFF: HO HUM, MORE WIKILEAKS “CHICKENFEED”
LAMEST WIKILEAK SO FAR…IS ISRAEL BEHIND IT?
The new Wikileaks claims the US undereported by 15,000, the deaths of Iraqi “civilians.” With the numbers listed by the military as little as 10% or less of the actual deaths, bumping up the numbers must be a joke.

Only Israel has the penetration of the Department of Defense that would allow this kind of spying. Not only can they do it, they also have so many spies in the American chain of command, they could easily prevent it. Who has the facilities to gather and filter this much data? Who would want to?

With the biggest story in Iraq the falsified intelligence on “weapons of mass destruction,” why didn’t Wikileaks get us documents on this?"


Comments:
Imad:

Oh, come ON. You have to be seriously into paranoid conspiracy theories to imagine that the Americans -- who by all accounts are frothing at the mouth with rage over Assange's spilling the beans on their transgressions large (e.g. atrocities in Iraq, e.g. "Collateral Murder", and Afghanistan) and small (e.g. Condi Rice and Hilary Clinton's illegal spying on other U.N. diplomatic missions) -- would suffer all the consequences of what has so far been released by Wikileaks, just so they could pull some kind of double deception about Israeli activities in Iraq and so on. [Incidentally : It appears that the U.S. Administration is (contrary to the claims made in the appended articles) trying to attack both the DNS references and the Web hosting services that provide an Internet presence to Wikileaks, but to Assange's credit -- he's no fool, he saw this coming -- the Wikileaks sites have considerable redundancy built in to them and they are defended by a sophisticated group of cypher-punks. The problem for Obama, Holder, et. al., is that they don't have the slightest shred of a credible excuse to go to non-American hosting providers and demand that Wikileaks be pulled from the Web... you see, unlike in America, a lot of European countries actually believe in "innocent until proven guilty" and "freedom of speech". Needless to say, this adherence to quaint, old-fashioned ideas of this type is driving the U.S. Far Right, bonkers. (Poor babies!)]

However vicious, criminal and oppressive the Americans are, they just aren't smart enough to pull something like that off. Possibly Mossad might be, but the issue there is, they would have had to have infiltrated Wikileaks in the first place -- but neither Assange nor his organization are important enough to Mossad or Shin Bet to warrant that kind of operation. The M.O. of those groups is much more like the targeted assassination of the Iranian nuclear scientists earlier this week (remember? two guys on a motorcycle, a limpet mine and BOOM!)... Mossad and Shin Bet don't drop nasty stories about people who they don't like, they simply liquidate them. No subtlety there, pardner!

You know, Imad, you need to apply Occam's Razor to all these conspiracy stories : "where there are several possible explanations for an event, all other things being equal, pick the most simple explanation". By far the most likely truth to the Wikileaks situation is that it really is a leak of information that the Americans wanted to hide, rather than release in some Bondian double deception guise. The enraged reaction of the U.S. Radical Right, not to mention the so-called "liberal" Obama Administration, shows this vividly.

Cheers
 
Good points, Evelyn. Now to think of the whole issue, I would like to add also these points:

1- The message of the Afghan war logs was: Taliban is cooperating with al-qaeda. Ben Laden was alive after 2006 (When we know he was dead since 2001)

2- The messages of the Iraq war logs were: the Iraqi government did most of the killings and torture. Iran is financing and supporting terrorism in Iraq.

3- The message of the cables is: Iran is the bad guy and all the Arabs in the region are in favor of bombing it.

The messages in all these leaks correspond with the USA propaganda. Nothing new.

The reports and cables seem to be selected to convey the wanted messages. In the latest leaks I tried to find anything about Iraq that was not Iranian. I could not. So , yes, Evelyn, Imad, Wiki ... leaks. But I have to admit, if this is true, it has been a brilliant plot.
 
Naom Chomsky on Wikileaks
 
See Gareth Porter's piece.
 
Funny enough, even Zbigniew Brzezinski doesn't think all the leaked information coming out of Wikileaks is a result of Army PFC Bradley Manning. As a matter of fact he suspects a foreign intelligence service may be providing the more embarrassing leaks.
 
Wiki-Leaks Serves Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran: ... The lies themselves don't frustrate me so much anymore, and I can understand why the general public are fooled, but I have to admit to being disappointed at how effortlessly the Wiki-leaks poison is being swallowed by so many supposedly alternative news sites. Sites like Counterpunch, Global Research, Citizens for a Legitimate Government and Information Clearing House, to name but a few, are all disseminating the Wiki-leaks story without so much as a hint of critical thought it seems.

And so to the latest raft of documents, partially released just a few days ago. When I read their contents, to say that I was shocked would be to grossly over-state my reaction. I could have written them myself:

Wiki-leaks: Iran 'obtains North Korea missiles which can strike Europe'

This one, I have to admit, is entirely believable because, after all, everyone knows Saddam had the same capability several years ago, remember? In fact, this 'revelation' about Iran's capability to threaten Europe is even more believable than the 'sexed-up' Iraq dossier claim, because this revelation comes from Wiki-leaks, an honest-to-god whistle blower organization, right? I mean, there's just no way that agents working on behalf of the US and Israeli governments could possibly use such an organization to spread propaganda, right?

Is there no one in the alternative news community that can see this for what it is? North Korea supplying missiles to Iran to attack Europe?! Right when the US and Israel are involved in a protracted effort to demonize Iran to the world and the US has an aircraft carrier sitting off the Korean Coast!? Is all of this meant to be so obvious, or did my reading of 'psychological operations for dummies' gift me with amazing insight into how political propaganda really works?

Ok, so I mentioned Israel a couple of times. Why? Here's one reason, from the horse's mouth:

In Israel the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said that he felt vindicated by [Wiki-leaks] revelations about the extent of international and Arab concern about Iran and its nuclear programme. "Israel has not been damaged at all by the WikiLeaks publications," Netayahu said.

"The documents show many sources backing Israel's assessments, particularly of Iran. Our region has been hostage to a narrative that is the result of 60 years of propaganda, which paints Israel as the greatest threat. In reality leaders understand that that view is bankrupt. For the first time in history there is agreement that Iran is the threat," he said.

(Cont'd below)
 
There is also the fact that it is public knowledge that Israel operates an extensive and very well-entrenched network of spies in the US, including the infamous Israeli art students.

In 2005 the FBI noted, for example, that Israel maintains "an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States." A key Israeli method, said the FBI report, is computer intrusion.

And what are we to make of the strange coincidence where, on the very same day that Wiki-leaks releases documents that contain key data about the Iranian nuclear program, the Israeli Mossad murders one Iranian nuclear scientist and injures another in Tehran?

In determining the origin of the Wiki-leaks documents, we need ask ourselves but one question: in whose interest is it to put pressure on the US government through the release of documents to the press (via Wiki-leaks) that force the US to do a certain amount of damage control, while simultaneously portraying Iran as the biggest threat to world peace? Because that, in the final analysis, is the overall effect of the Wiki-leaks documents. Wiki-leaks performs so poorly in the 'smell test' that I feel confident in suggesting that the documents may not even be original documents; and if they are, they have very likely been amended in such a way that they serve the Israeli/Zionist agenda.
 
P.S. Noam Chomsky (for whom at one time I had great respect) and Amy Goodman are gatekeepers. Period.
 

W i k i S t i n k
: Although WikiLeaks claims to provide a counter balance to the decades of disinformation served up in heaps by the “old media”, it chose to allow the vetting of these documents by these same outlets. Other highly respected media outlets, like al Jazeera and various independent media, were excluded. ...

...[D]oes anyone find it odd that while most world leaders are quietly bracing themselves for embarrassment and diplomatic repercussions, Benjamin Netanyahu is confidently speaking and gloating about how Saudia Arabia has urged attacking Iran? I sure do.

There are still thousands more cables to be reviewed and redacted by the good old boy network of ‘old media’ and I hope that the cables they release in the coming days and months will prove my suspicions moot. I’m willing to keep an open mind until we’ve seen the full leak. In the meantime, what we know so far does not add up and frankly smells rotten.
 
... and we can't FIND Julian Assange. (By the way, just where is Osama?)
 
Imad,

Thank you for this.

I independently came to the conclusion that Wikileaks must be a COINTELPRO exercise when, some time back, I heard that Assange's location couldn't be located. Who in the hell would believe that sort of shit? Answer: The US public.
 
Funny enough, even Zbigniew Brezezinski doesn't think all the leaked information coming out of Wikileaks is a result of Army PFC Bradley Manning. As a matter of fact he suspects a foreign intelligence service may be providing the more embarrassing leaks.
 
AN ADDITIONAL THOUGHT:

The very fact of the coverage being given "Wikileaks" by the U.S. mainstream media is a HUGE clue that there is a covert agenda that transcends (or underlies) the continuous public presentation.

ALL corporate media - without exception - are propaganda tools. Important information is hidden. Trivia is emphasized. Misdirection is the name of the game. Always, we must ask ourselves, WHAT ARE WE NOT BEING TOLD? WHAT IS THE DECEPTION? Hard as it is to believe, American citizens are as targeted - though, perhaps differently, for the time being - as others around the world who are more overtly victimized by the power structure. But all ordinary folk are expendable.

Right now, as I write, people in states bordering on the Gulf of Mexico are sick and dying from the devastating BP "spill" and dispersants. Perhaps MILLIONS of people, but not a word in the media. It looks like BP is off the hook. We live in a fascist state and most people are unaware. Until THEIR turn comes.

And then there are the FEMA camps. Who knows what they are for, or what the fate will be (is?) of those who may end up in them. What is happening to all the unemployed and families who have lost their homes? By now we should know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the media does not go where it is not invited. If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it . . . ???????????
 
WIKILEAKS AND ESPIONAGE – ISRAELI STYLE
 
GENERAL SAYS WIKILEAKS IS CIA AND MOSSAD
 
JULIAN ASSANGE PROTECTED BY UK AND MOSSAD? UK police officers "are yet to receive any official instructions to arrest him."
 
Why haven't British police arrested WikiLeaks boss on Interpol wanted list even though they know where he is? Britain's Serious Organised Crime Agency has received the so-called 'Red Notice' international arrest warrant, which is also posted on the Interpol website, but has so far refused to authorise his arrest.
 
WikiLeaks strengthen Netanyahu’s hand
 
Jahanpour: US following Israeli 5-Point Plan on Iran: Wikileaks - What is truly alarming about the new batch of Wikileaks diplomatic files is the extent to which US politicians and their Israeli allies are obsessed with Iran. There is virtually no talk of Israeli colonial settlements on the West Bank, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the war crimes in Gaza, the attack on the aid flotilla, and Israel’s arsenal of hundreds of nuclear weapons, but there is constant preoccupation with Iran’s uranium enrichment and whether Israel or the United States should attack Iran first.
 
The Guardian gave State Dept. cables to the NY Times
 
In the meantime, life goes on as usual:
Israel Announces More Settlement Expansions in East Jerusalem
 
Never mind. Israel will be Israel.
5-year-old Palestinian boy witnessing Israeli soldiers dragging his father away
 
And it is for all those reasons we think UN must do a good work post Iraq war.
That is our petitions to UN General Secretary and UN Right Humans Comission.
Help us to spread that Imad. Thank you.
http://www.gopetition.com/petition/40587.html
http://www.gopetition.com/petition/40844.html
And Evelyn, thanks to make us think. I do not tell you are right. But you have great arguments!
Our page at FB:
http://www.gopetition.com/petition/40844.html
Adelia Maria
 
Video (15 min): Friends of Israel — Enemies Inside the Gates: "The most dangerous, deceitful, destructive nation on Earth is nuclear Apartheid Israel.

There are only two reasons to be friends with Israel: Arcane superstitious belief, or for personal gain. For citizens from the Land Down Under, the choice is blindingly simple: Do we want to be governed from Canberra, or from Tel Aviv?"


* * * * * * * * *

(For U.S. citizens, the choice is the same. And I believe there is a third explanation for our politicians' obsequiousness toward Israel: BLACKMAIL - personal and national. Israeli tentacles are everywhere. Their destructive power is massive. Who will stand up to them? How? We know they murder or otherwise destroy those who try.)
 
FIRE NEXT TIME

(Will Israel learn? Don't hold your breath - in my opinion.)
 
Julian Assange answers your questions
 
Everything you wanted to know about Wikileaks but didn't know to ask: Julian Assange

He's a guy with a vague history...

Who travels the world without visible means of support...

His parents: Members of an LSD "cult" that abused kids...

Hmmm...

He's not against war...

He hates the 9/11 truth movement...

He has no info about the Bush or Obama White House...or the Federal Reserve Bank...or Goldman Sachs (but he is helping take down Bank of America)...

His "leaks" paint Pakistan as a threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't like as jerks...

He believes Osama is alive...and probably in Pakistan...

Everything else he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew...

The mainstream media loves him...

The right wingers love to hate him and are using him as a justification to censor the Net...

If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck...

Another intelligence agency spectacle.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

01/12/04   01/01/05   01/02/05   01/03/05   01/04/05   01/05/05   01/06/05   01/07/05   01/08/05   01/09/05   01/10/05   01/11/05   01/12/05   01/01/06   01/02/06   01/03/06   01/04/06   01/05/06   01/06/06   01/07/06   01/08/06   01/09/06   01/10/06   01/11/06   01/12/06   01/01/07   01/02/07   01/03/07   01/04/07   01/05/07   01/06/07   01/07/07   01/08/07   01/09/07   01/10/07   01/11/07   01/12/07   01/01/08   01/02/08   01/03/08   01/04/08   01/05/08   01/06/08   01/07/08   01/08/08   01/09/08   01/10/08   01/11/08   01/12/08   01/01/09   01/02/09   01/03/09   01/04/09   01/05/09   01/06/09   01/07/09   01/08/09   01/09/09   01/10/09   01/11/09   01/12/09   01/01/10   01/02/10   01/03/10   01/04/10   01/05/10   01/06/10   01/08/10   01/09/10   01/10/10   01/11/10   01/12/10   01/01/11   01/02/11   01/03/11   01/04/11   01/05/11   01/06/11   01/07/11   01/08/11   01/09/11   01/10/11   01/11/11   01/12/11   01/01/12   01/02/12   01/03/12   01/04/12   01/05/12   01/06/12   01/07/12   01/08/12   01/09/12   01/10/12   01/11/12   01/12/12   01/01/13   01/02/13   01/03/13   01/04/13   01/05/13  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?